The Ottoman Army and the First World War is a thorough analysis of the Ottoman Army
on all fronts during the Great War. It describes its operational military history and
military effectiveness during that war, and it is difficult to disagree with Uyar in his
assessment that Western historiography has for too long ignored the so-called
peripheral campaigns of the war.
He reminds us that in 1914 it was by no means a foregone conclusion that the Ottomans would join the Central Powers. Once committed, the author contends that the First World War exposed Ottoman unpreparedness, having taken no steps prior to the war to secure stocks of food, fuel or munitions. Another of the book's themes is the constant interference of Germany's High Command and Ottoman acquiescence to both its strategic vision and its demands.
Western scholars have long struggled with access to Turkey's war archives, let alone
the translation of both old and modern Turkish. If only for this reason Uyar's book is
tremendously important for those interested in the Ottoman contribution to the First
World War. The footnotes contain some archival material which sees the light of day
for the first time. There is an extensive and up-to-date bibliography providing a handy
synthesis of non-English language sources, although the author has not included Klaus
Wolf's 2020 in-depth study of the German-Ottoman Alliance.
The Turkish Soldier—Tough, Tenacious, and Enduring |
Uyar highlights the problems found in the wake of army reorganization when, in 1911, triangular divisions were established but insufficient attention was given to doctrine
and combat services support, which were ignored. He details the vastly over-stretched
military resources of the Ottoman Empire in the lead-up to and subsequent
prosecution of the First and Second Balkan Wars.
The author examines the genesis of German military advisors and support. Initially the
German alliance appeared to provide security against the territorial aspirations of both
greater and lesser powers. But the optimism of the German High Command in using
pan-Islamism as a force multiplier soon foundered on the reality of regional and tribal
politics. In the body of the text, it is refreshing to see that Austro-Hungarian units and
armaments deployed to Turkey receive more than a passing footnote. Little-known
Ottoman contributions to Macedonia, Galicia, and Romania are also included in this
study.
While the Ottoman Army of 1914 was far more representative of the empire's
population than that of any other period, it lacked well-trained NCOs. This hindered
the effectiveness of mobilization and the sudden appearance of tens of thousands of
new recruits. In this the empire was not alone. The British Dominions shared a similar
experience. The Ottoman Army was initially hampered by the total absence of aviation
assets and any organization to manage line of communications issues. In addition, much
heavy equipment and weapons had been lost in the Balkan Wars (1912/13).
Unfortunately, the Ottoman High Command made no systematic effort to resolve or
at least reduce the impact of these problems. Lack of a good road and rail network
did not help matters. In 1914 the Ottoman Army was burdened by the inheritance of
a dying empire: rampant corruption; inefficiency, and inadequate lines of
communications; and hopelessly inadequate medical and veterinary care.
There was an abysmal lack of understanding in Berlin of not only the cultural and political mores of its Ottoman ally, but the challenges facing a collapsing empire from 1917 onward. We learn too that as early as April 1914, senior German advisors worked actively to deny Ottoman officers positions of influence and kept them uninformed of developments on the Western Front. The author also highlights fundamental tactical flaws in General von Sanders' initial defense plan for the Dardanelles in March-April 1915, where his interference further exacerbated tensions between the Ottoman staff and their German advisors.
Michael Tyquin
Thank you for the review, Michael. This sounds very useful.
ReplyDeleteDoes it address the war with Russia, or does it focus on the Ottoman struggle against Britain and France?
Does the author discuss the multitude of languages in the Ottoman Empire, making communication with a unit difficult?
ReplyDelete